10-10-10: Sixteen years later, Bonaireans are still demanding justice

Sixteen years after Bonaire's transition into a public entity within the Netherlands on October 10, 2010, fundamental questions remain about democratic consent, human rights, economic inequality, cultural identity and the right of Bonaireans to shape their own future.

The promise of a better life through closer ties with the Netherlands must be measured against people's lived experiences. Rising living costs, housing pressures, access to essential services, the protection of Papiamentu and cultural identity, and limited influence over decisions affecting Bonaire continue to raise questions about whether the transition delivered what people expected.

The 2010 Warning and Referendum

On October 7, 2010, I sent a letter of warning and objection to then-Lieutenant Governor Glenn Thode and other Dutch, local and Antillean government authorities. The concerns raised at that time remain relevant today.

The December 2010 referendum recorded 2,879 votes against the proposition concerning Bonaire's public-entity status under Article 134 of the Dutch Constitution, compared with 391 votes in favor. The required turnout threshold was not met. Nevertheless, the failure of the then-island government and Island Council, which had the power to recognize the rejection as a legitimate expression of the people's will but failed to do so, remains a contentious chapter in Bonaire's constitutional and political history.

Questions also remain about the final report of the United Nations electoral observer who visited Bonaire during the referendum. Despite subsequent inquiries, the Dutch government has never made the report publicly available.

222 Days of Protest and the 2015 Referendum

After 222 days of continuous, day-and-night protests demanding another referendum, an agreement was reached to hold a vote.

On December 18, 2015, Bonaireans again expressed their dissatisfaction with the constitutional relationship. Of the 7,689 valid votes, 5,040, approximately 65.55%, were cast against the proposition, while 2,649 were cast in favor.

The Island Council unanimously endorsed the result as a democratic decision of the people. Yet, in my view, the failure to deliver meaningful change represented another disregard for the democratic decision and will of the Bonairean people.

The 2017 Constitutional Change: Against the Democratic Will and Decision of the Bonairean People

Despite unresolved concerns arising from both referenda, a further constitutional change took effect on November 17, 2017. The Netherlands introduced Article 132a, embedding Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba in the Dutch Constitution as public bodies.

This occurred against the expressed democratic will of the people. In my view, the island's political leaders, some of whom remain active today, once again accepted deeper constitutional integration without a direct mandate from the people.

In doing so, they disregarded and betrayed the democratic rejection expressed in 2010 and 2015, undermining the right of Bonaireans to determine their own constitutional status.

What Is the Younger Generation Telling Us?

A young Bonairean recently questioned whether people in 2010 fully understood the implications of the transition. Many expected better salaries, improved living standards and better essential services. Yet concerns remain about local control, rising living costs, household incomes and the growing dominance of Dutch in education at the expense of Papiamentu and cultural identity.

A constitutional arrangement must be judged not only by its promises but also by its effects on the people.

Bonaire needs development, and development is a fundamental right of its people. However, it must not come at the expense of Bonaireans' right to determine their own future, preserve their cultural identity or participate meaningfully in public decision-making.

Healthcare, education, social protection and economic opportunities are not favors. They are fundamental human rights concerns under international standards to which the Netherlands is committed.

James Finies and BHRO Bring Bonaire's Concerns to the United Nations

During the examination of the Netherlands by the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) in Geneva in September 2025, BHRO submitted a report directly to Committee Chair Ambassador Preeti Saran and Rapporteur Julieta Rossi on September 17.

Committee members raised questions concerning healthcare, cultural adaptation, consultation, respect for cultural and religious beliefs, and the protection of Bonaire's native language and cultural identity in education.

The Committee's concluding observations expressed concern about the limited information available on economic, social and cultural rights in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba.

The Netherlands must explain how it intends to address these concerns. Constitutional integration alone does not guarantee equal rights in practice.

The Call for International Accountability

On June 10, 2026, the Bahamas advanced a draft resolution initiative within the United Nations General Assembly process supporting Bonaire's proposed reinstatement on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories.

This brought Bonaire's case before UN Member States and the wider international community, raising fundamental questions about its political status, self-government and the right of its people to determine their own political future.

Chapter XI, Article 73 of the UN Charter addresses the responsibilities of administering powers toward territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government.

The right of Bonaireans to determine their own political future is also recognized under Article 1 of both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Reinstatement on the UN list would provide a framework for accountability and renewed international scrutiny of the Netherlands' responsibilities, as well as Bonaire's political status and development.

Sixteen Years Later: The Demand for Justice and Self-Determination Remains

Sixteen years after 10-10-10, the questions remain: Where is the 2010 UN electoral observer's report? What action will be taken to address Bonaire's human rights concerns? How will Papiamentu and cultural identity be protected? And when will Bonaireans have a meaningful voice in determining their own political future?

Bonaireans deserve more than promises. They deserve transparency, equal protection of their rights, respect for their identity and genuine participation in decisions affecting their lives.

The demand is for justice, accountability and a future in which the people of Bonaire have a meaningful and rightful say in their own destiny.

‍